Aug

31

Announced in June, the NHL rule changes for the 2007-2008 season seemed to be the most important topic of discussion at the time. However, can we all actually remember those changes as we approach the start of the pre-season? Fortunately, we have proided a quick list of the changes, along with a few of the pros and cons, courtesy of the original NHL article. A handful of new rules are introduced every year or two which, for the most part, improves the overall game of hockey. Alternatively, they also create a myriad of controversies and debates!

Gross Misconduct: No longer will this term be used in the NHL, but will rather be classified as a Game Misconduct. This should clear up a bit of confusion with the terminology, as distinguishing between the two was something of a challenge. Survivor: Misconduct might have been a viable entertainment source! This rule change appears to be more a clarification issue, rather than altering any aspect of the game.

Penalty Shots: Previously, penalty shots could only be awarded when a penalty was called in the offensive zone. This season, any interference with a player in the offensive and neutral zones will result in a penalty shot. Therefore, we should see many more adrenaline-filled rushes to the net. In all honesty, there is not a great deal of room in the offensive zone when a player is rushing the net. Time and time again, many players were held up in the neutral zone when there was a clear possibility of an important goal. This new rule may result in more stoppages in play, but will most certainly reward speedy, talented players. Afinogenov fans, rejoice!

Interference: Prior to the 2007-2008 season, injuries resulting from interference could only result in minor penalties. The new rule states that referees will be given the decision to assess a major penalty and a game misconduct for these injuries. In any contact sport, injuries are bound to occur. It is difficult to determine vicious intent, but at least there is the option for a more severe penalty. Hopefully this rule will be used in moderation, though, since injuries resulting from interference are not always intentional. Some cases in point from last season come to mind, but those players are no longer Sabres, and they deserve no sympathy!

Face-Offs: All face-offs must now take place on one of the nine face-off circles on the ice. Last season, situations involving pucks traveling over the glass could result in face-offs taking place at different locations. This rule should save referees a bit of time in pin-pointing where the puck had left the ice. Although it was rare to come across a dispute, clearly stating where all face-offs are to take place seems to make the process a lot easier. All NHL rinks are dotted with face-off circles, which eliminates another of the chance factors.

These rule changes are not too earth-shattering, but will add some more clarity to the game. We will have to wait and see, though, what types of calls end up in those undying frustrations. At the very least, Sabres fans can be well-informed about what the future season has in store!


Comments

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Speak your mind